Umar said: “The Oando issue was a forensic audit, ETI was corporate governance audit. “Remember when this audit was to commence initially, Oando took SEC to court and that delayed the entire process. “After they had taken SEC to court and questioned our powers to carry out the audit. The forensic audit corroborated the investigation earlier conducted so they had every opportunity to have presented their facts. “The Chairman and MD of ETI had to leave their positions in their time, they did not question SEC.

Source: The Guardian June 19, 2019 04:19 UTC